Belt Filter Presses

Belt filter presses dewater sludge by mechanically squeezing conditioned biosolids between two tensioned filter belts under increasing pressure. Sludge is gravity-drained, then compressed through a series of rollers ranging from 3 to 15 feet in width. Typical municipal installations achieve 18-25% dry solids content from feed sludge at 3-6% solids, processing 50-500 GPM of sludge flow. The primary trade-off is higher polymer consumption (4-8 lbs/dry ton) compared to centrifuges, but with lower power requirements and simpler maintenance for smaller municipal facilities.

• Primary Sludge Dewatering (2-25 MGD plants): Belt filter presses handle primary clarifier underflow at 2-4% solids, producing cake at 18-22% solids. Selected for consistent performance with fibrous materials and lower polymer consumption than centrifuges. Feeds from gravity thickeners, discharges to trucks or conveyors.

• WAS Dewatering (5-50 MGD plants): Processes waste activated sludge from secondary clarifiers, typically at 0.8-1.2% solids input. Achieves 16-20% cake solids with proper polymer conditioning. Preferred over plate presses for continuous operation and lower labor requirements. Often follows dissolved air flotation thickening.

• Digested Sludge Processing (10+ MGD plants): Handles anaerobic digester output at 3-5% solids, producing 20-25% cake. Selected for ability to process variable feed consistency and lower maintenance than screw presses. Integrates with digester gas systems and thermal conditioning.

• Lime Sludge Applications (water plants): Processes lime softening residuals, achieving 35-45% cake solids due to excellent drainage characteristics. Chosen for minimal polymer requirements and cake handling properties.

Daily Operations: Monitor cake consistency, belt tracking, and wash water clarity every 2 hours. Adjust polymer feed rates based on visual cake quality and filtrate turbidity. Record throughput rates, cake solids, and polymer consumption. Typical 8-hour shifts handle 50-200 GPM feed flows with minimal operator intervention.

​

Maintenance: Weekly belt inspection for tears or stretching, monthly roller bearing lubrication, quarterly belt replacement planning. Requires confined space entry training for internal cleaning. Standard PPE includes safety glasses, steel-toed boots, and hearing protection. Maintenance staff need basic mechanical skills for belt changes and pump servicing.

​

Troubleshooting: Belt blinding indicates inadequate wash water or polymer overdose - reduces capacity 30-50%. Excessive belt wear suggests misalignment or foreign objects. Poor cake release often means insufficient polymer or worn belts. Warning signs include increased filtrate

• Filter Belts: Woven polypropylene or polyester fabric, 2-4 meter widths typical for municipal applications. Upper belt provides drainage, lower belt supports cake formation. Belt life 12-18 months depending on feed characteristics and wash water quality.

• Roller System: Stainless steel rollers (200-800mm diameter) create pressure zones from 2-15 psi. Includes gravity drainage, low-pressure, and high-pressure zones. Pneumatic tensioning maintains 300-500 lbs belt tension.

• Polymer Feed System: Dilutes neat polymer to 0.25-0.5% active solution, feeds at 5-20 lbs/dry ton rates. Includes day tanks, metering pumps, and static mixers. Critical for floc formation and water release.

• Wash Water System: High-pressure (80-120 psi) spray nozzles clean belts continuously. Requires 8-15 gpm/meter belt width. Oscillating headers prevent blinding. Filtrate recycle common to reduce fresh water consumption.

• Drive System: Variable frequency drives control belt speeds 0.5-6 m/min. Torque monitoring prevents belt damage. Includes emergency stops and belt tracking controls.

• Hydraulic Loading Rate: 2-8 gpm/ft of belt width for municipal sludge (typical 4-6 gpm/ft)

• Solids Loading Rate: 150-400 lbs dry solids/hr/meter of belt width (municipal average 250-300 lbs/hr/m)

• Belt Width: Standard municipal sizes 1.0m, 1.5m, 2.0m, 2.5m, 3.0m for 0.5-50 MGD plants

• Belt Speed: Variable 0.5-6 ft/min (typical municipal operation 2-4 ft/min)

• Filtration Pressure: Gravity zone atmospheric, low pressure 0.5-2 psi, high pressure 4-15 psi

• Cake Solids Concentration: 18-25% for primary sludge, 15-22% for WAS, 20-28% for digested sludge

• Polymer Dosage: 8-20 lbs active polymer per dry ton of solids (municipal average 12-15 lbs/ton)

• Wash Water Requirements: 15-25 gpm per meter of belt width at 80-120 psi

• Power Requirements: 3-15 HP total per meter of belt width including drives, wash pumps, and vacuum

• Capture Rate: 95-98% for properly conditioned municipal sludge

• What belt width is required for peak hydraulic and solids loading? Calculate based on peak hour sludge production plus 25% safety factor. Undersizing by one width increment (e.g., 2.0m vs 2.5m) typically results in 15-20% capacity reduction and poor cake quality during peak flows. Need accurate sludge production data including seasonal variations and future growth projections.

• Should the system include vacuum assistance or rely on gravity/pressure only? Vacuum systems (10-15" Hg) increase capture rates by 2-3% and improve cake dryness by 1-2 percentage points but add $50,000-100,000 in capital costs plus ongoing maintenance. Required for sludges with poor settleability (SVI >200) or plants targeting >22% cake solids.

• What level of automation and controls integration is needed? Basic manual operation saves $25,000-50,000 but requires dedicated operator attention. Full SCADA integration with automatic polymer feed control and belt tracking costs more but reduces polymer usage by 10-15% and prevents costly belt damage. Consider staffing levels and operator experience.

• How will polymer preparation and feed be sized? Undersized polymer systems create bottlenecks limiting press capacity by 20-30%. Size for 150% of design polymer dose with dual-train redundancy for plants >10 MGD.

• Division 40-48: Process Integration

• Section 46 13 16 - Sludge Dewatering Equipment

• Primary specification section covering belt filter presses, polymer feed systems, and ancillary equipment. May reference Section 40 05 00 for process piping and 46

• Material/Equipment Verification:

  • Verify stainless steel grades (316SS minimum for wash systems)

  • Confirm polymer feed system compatibility and turndown ratios

  • Check belt tracking and tensioning mechanisms

• Installation Requirements:

  • Concrete pad with 6-8" thick reinforced slab

  • Overhead crane access (10-15 ft minimum clearance)

  • Wash water supply (40-60 psi, 150-300 gpm)

• Field Challenges:

  • Belt alignment during startup requires experienced technicians

  • Polymer feed line routing critical for even distribution

• Coordination Issues:

  • Lead times: 16-24 weeks for standard units, 28+ weeks for custom sizes

  • Coordinate electrical/controls integration early with plant SCADA systems

• Andritz - BELT PRESS B series (municipal workhorse, 0.5-2m belt widths)

• Alfa Laval - AS-H Belt Press (reliable performance, strong service network)

• Huber Technology - BELT PRESS Q-PRESS (compact design, good for smaller plants)

• Komline-Sanderson - KOMPRESS (established US presence, robust construction)

• All maintain active municipal references and service support across North America.

• Centrifuges: Higher throughput (2-3x), better for larger plants (>5 MGD), but 40-60% higher capital cost and higher maintenance requirements.

• Screw Presses: Lower capital cost (20-30% less), simpler operation, but limited to 18-22% cake solids vs 25-30% for belt presses.

• Filter Presses: Highest cake solids (35-45%), but batch operation limits throughput and requires more operator attention.

Establish strong manufacturer relationships early - belt replacement and service quality vary significantly between vendors. Budget 15-20% above base price for essential options like variable speed drives and automated wash systems. Consider purchasing spare belts during initial order to avoid future price increases. Train multiple operators on belt tracking procedures; improper tensioning causes 60% of premature belt failures.