Chemical Tablet Feeders

Overview

Chemical tablet feeders automatically dissolve and dose solid chemical tablets into water treatment processes, primarily for disinfection and pH adjustment applications. These systems use controlled water flow to dissolve tablets in a dissolution chamber, creating a concentrated solution that's injected downstream. Typical dissolution rates range from 0.5 to 15 pounds per day depending on tablet size and water flow rate. The key trade-off is between operational simplicity and dosing precision - while tablet feeders require minimal maintenance and operator attention, they provide less precise chemical control compared to liquid feed systems, making them better suited for smaller plants or backup applications.

Common Applications

• Final Disinfection Systems (2-50 MGD): Tablet feeders provide backup or primary chlorination in smaller plants, feeding directly into clearwells or distribution systems. Selected for simplicity and reduced chemical handling compared to gas chlorine. Upstream from contact basins, downstream to distribution.

• Remote Lift Stations: Cal-hypo tablets control septicity and odors in force mains, with feeders installed upstream of wet wells. Chosen for unmanned operation and elimination of liquid chemical deliveries to remote sites.

• Seasonal Treatment Plants: Summer-only facilities use tablet feeders for primary disinfection due to intermittent operation requirements. Tablets don't degrade during shutdown periods like liquid sodium hypochlorite.

• Small Plant Oxidation: Iron and manganese control using potassium permanganate tablets, feeding ahead of filtration. Selected for precise dosing control and extended shelf life in low-flow applications under 5 MGD.

Operator Experience

Daily Operations: Operators monitor solution tank levels, tablet inventory, and pump stroke rates during routine rounds. Flow pacing adjustments made via control panel based on plant flow changes. Residual testing confirms proper dosing rates, with typical adjustments of ±10-20% based on seasonal demand variations.

Maintenance: Weekly cleaning of dissolution chambers and monthly pump diaphragm inspections. Quarterly tablet hopper cleaning requires full PPE due to dust exposure. Semi-annual pump head replacement typical for diaphragm units. Most maintenance performed by plant staff with basic mechanical skills and manufacturer training.

Troubleshooting: Common failures include pump diaphragm rupture (6-12 month intervals), tablet bridging in hoppers, and dissolution chamber scaling. Warning signs include erratic feed rates, low solution levels, and residual loss. Pump heads typically require replacement every 8,000-12,000 hours of operation depending on chemical type and concentration.

Major Components

• Dissolution Chamber: Stainless steel or PVC vessel where tablets dissolve into concentrated solution. Sized 5-50 gallons based on demand, with level controls and overflow protection. Selection based on tablet type compatibility and required residence time.

• Erosion Control System: Adjustable water flow mechanism controlling dissolution rate through spray nozzles or weirs. Flow rates typically 0.1-2.0 GPM. Critical for maintaining consistent chemical strength and preventing over-dissolution.

• Solution Pump: Diaphragm or peristaltic pump delivering concentrated solution to injection point. Capacity ranges 0.05-5.0 GPH with turndown ratios up to 100:1. Selected based on required dosing accuracy and head requirements.

• Tablet Storage Hopper: Corrosion-resistant hopper holding 50-500 pounds of tablets with gravity or auger feed systems. Materials include polyethylene or fiberglass, sized for 30-90 day chemical inventory based on consumption rates.

Design Criteria

• Feed Rate Capacity: 0.1-100 lbs/day tablet dissolution rate, corresponding to 0.5-50 MGD treatment capacity depending on dosage requirements (typically 1-5 mg/L for chlorination, 10-50 mg/L for coagulation)

• Dissolution Chamber Volume: 0.5-20 cubic feet, sized for 2-8 hour tablet residence time at maximum feed rate to ensure complete dissolution without channeling

• Water Flow Through Dissolver: 0.5-50 GPM bypass flow, typically 0.1-0.2% of main process flow, with adjustable flow control valve for feed rate modulation

• Operating Pressure Range: 5-150 PSI system pressure capability, with pressure-reducing stations for low-pressure applications below 20 PSI

• Feed Accuracy: ±5-10% of setpoint under steady-state conditions, ±15% during flow transients typical in municipal applications

• Tablet Hopper Capacity: 50-2,000 lbs storage, sized for 7-30 day capacity at average feed rate to minimize refill frequency

• Solution Strength: 500-15,000 mg/L achievable concentration depending on tablet type and dissolution chamber design, with calcium hypochlorite typically achieving 1,000-3,000 mg/L

Key Design Decisions

• What is the required chemical feed range and turndown ratio? Municipal plants need 10:1 minimum turndown (0.1-1.0 mg/L to 1.0-10 mg/L dosing range). Inadequate turndown forces oversized units with poor low-flow accuracy or requires multiple parallel feeders, increasing capital costs by 40-60%.

• Should the system be pressure-fed or gravity-fed? Pressure systems work with existing plant hydraulics but limit tablet types due to dissolution pressure effects. Gravity systems require elevated installation (8-15 feet) but provide better dissolution control. Wrong choice affects installation costs by $5,000-15,000 and operational reliability.

• What tablet formulation matches water chemistry and contact time? Calcium hypochlorite tablets require pH >7.0 and 30+ minute contact time, while trichlor tablets work at pH 6.5-7.5 with 15-minute contact. Mismatched chemistry causes incomplete disinfection or excessive chloramine formation.

• How will seasonal demand variations be accommodated? Summer peak flows may be 2-3x winter average in many municipalities. Fixed-capacity dissolvers undersized for peak demand compromise treatment reliability during critical high-demand periods.

Specification Section

• Division 40 - Process Integration

• Section 40 05 00 - Common Work Results for Process Integration

• Section 40 20 00 - Process Piping (for dissolution chamber and solution transfer piping)

• Primary specification under water treatment equipment integration, with coordination requirements for chemical feed pumps and control systems.

Submittal + Construction Considerations

• Material/Equipment Verification: Verify NSF-61 certification for potable water contact, Confirm tablet chamber material compatibility (typically PVC or fiberglass), Check flow control valve specifications and materials

• Installation Requirements: Adequate ventilation for chlorine gas release during maintenance, Accessible location for monthly tablet refilling, Proper piping materials (Schedule 80 PVC minimum), Bypass capability for maintenance

• Field Challenges: Tablet bridging in humid climates requires anti-caking additives, Underdissolution from insufficient contact time, Overdissolution causing equipment corrosion

• Coordination Issues: Electrical for flow switches and alarms, Structural support for larger multi-chamber units, HVAC coordination for ventilation requirements

• Lead times typically 6-8 weeks for standard units, 12+ weeks for custom configurations.

Popular Manufacturers and Models

• Hach (Loveland, CO): CLF10 Tablet Chlorinator - widely used in small municipal systems, 5-500 GPM capacity range.

• Evoqua Water Technologies: Chlor-Scale tablet feeders - popular for mid-size plants, available in multiple chamber configurations.

• Capital Controls (Colmar, PA): Series 6000 tablet chlorinators - established in municipal market with proven track record.

• Neptune Chemical Pump: TabletPac systems - integrated approach combining tablets with metering pumps for larger applications.

Alternative Equipment

• Gas chlorination systems: Preferred for larger plants (>2 MGD) due to lower chemical costs and precise control, but require extensive safety equipment and training.

• Liquid sodium hypochlorite: Common alternative offering better control and safety, typically 15-20% higher operating costs but eliminates tablet handling issues.

• UV disinfection with chloramination: Growing preference for primary disinfection, using tablets only for residual maintenance - higher capital cost but reduced chemical dependency and improved water quality.

Real-World Tips

Size tablet chambers 25% larger than calculated to prevent bridging issues, especially in high-humidity climates. Establish relationships with local chemical suppliers early - tablet availability can be inconsistent, and bulk purchasing reduces costs significantly. Install removable tablet screens to catch undissolved fragments that can clog downstream equipment. Consider dual-chamber systems for redundancy rather than single large chambers, as maintenance flexibility outweighs the cost premium in most municipal applications.

Connect with Local Representative
If you need help with sizing, system compatibility,  maintenance planning, or sourcing, connect with your local manufacturer's representative. They can assist you in selecting the right equipment for your specific application and site conditions.

Connect with a Local Distributor

If you need help with sizing, system compatibility,  maintenance planning, or sourcing, connect with your local manufacturer's representative. They can assist you in selecting the right equipment for your specific application and site conditions.