Cylindrical Bar Screens

Cylindrical bar screens remove coarse debris and solids from wastewater influent through a rotating cylindrical drum with longitudinal bars spaced 6-25mm apart. Raw wastewater flows through the cylinder from inside to outside, with solids retained on the inner surface and continuously removed by spray wash systems or internal rakes. These screens typically achieve 85-95% removal of solids larger than the bar spacing at design flows up to 15 MGD per unit. The primary trade-off is higher capital cost and mechanical complexity compared to static bar screens, requiring regular maintenance of rotating components and wash systems.

• Headworks Primary Screening: Cylindrical bar screens serve as the first line of defense in municipal headworks, typically handling 0.5-10 MGD flows. They're selected for their ability to handle high debris loads while maintaining consistent hydraulic performance. Located upstream of grit removal and downstream of influent channels, they remove large solids (>6mm) while allowing smaller particles to pass to downstream fine screens.

• Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO) Facilities: These screens excel in CSO applications handling 2-25 MGD peak flows due to their self-cleaning capability during high flow events. They're positioned upstream of disinfection systems, removing gross solids that could interfere with UV or chlorination processes while handling the variable debris loads typical in storm events.

• Small Plant Retrofits: For 0.5-5 MGD facilities upgrading from manual bar racks, cylindrical screens offer automated operation in constrained spaces. They're often installed in existing channels with minimal structural modifications, positioned upstream of existing lift stations or aeration basins where space limitations make other screen types impractical.

Daily Operations: Operators monitor screen differential pressure (typically 2-6 inches maximum), rotation cycles, and debris discharge rates. Visual inspection includes checking spray nozzle function, drive motor temperature, and screenings conveyor operation. Flow-based automatic operation requires minimal adjustment, though operators may modify cleaning cycles during high debris periods or seasonal leaf loading.

​

Maintenance: Weekly lubrication of drive components and monthly spray system inspection prevent most failures. Quarterly replacement of spray nozzles and semi-annual drive alignment checks are standard. Maintenance requires confined space entry procedures and lockout/tagout protocols. Basic mechanical skills suffice for routine tasks, though motor and VFD service requires electrical expertise.

​

Troubleshooting: Common failures include spray system clogging (indicated by poor cleaning), drive overload from debris jams (torque monitoring alerts), and bearing wear (vibration/noise increase). Typical service life spans 15-20 years for mechanical components, 8-12 years for drives. Warning signs include increased differential pressure, irregular rotation, or debris carryover, often indicating worn cleaning systems or structural damage requiring immediate attention.

• Rotating Drum Assembly: Stainless steel 304 or 316 construction with 6mm-25mm bar spacing, typically 4-12 feet diameter for municipal applications. Rotation speed varies 0.5-3 RPM based on flow conditions. Selection depends on channel width, debris load, and required capture efficiency.

• Cleaning Mechanism: High-pressure spray system (80-120 PSI) or brush assemblies remove captured debris. Spray nozzles require 304SS construction with 15-30 GPM capacity per foot of screen width. Brush systems use polyurethane bristles for abrasive debris removal.

• Drive System: Gear-reduced motors (0.5-5 HP) with variable frequency drives for speed control. Typically include torque monitoring to detect debris loading and automatic reverse capabilities for jam clearing.

• Screenings Handling: Integral screw conveyors or belt systems transport removed debris to containers or wash/compaction units. Sizing based on 2-8 cubic feet per million gallons of debris volume, with 304SS construction for corrosion resistance in municipal environments.

• Flow Capacity: 0.5-15 MGD typical municipal range, with individual units handling 1-8 MGD. Sizing based on peak hourly flow plus 25% safety factor.

• Bar Spacing: 6mm (1/4") to 25mm (1") clear openings. Standard municipal applications use 6-10mm for primary screening, 15-20mm for preliminary screening upstream of pumps.

• Approach Velocity: 0.6-1.2 m/s (2-4 ft/s) through screen openings. Velocities below 0.6 m/s cause solids deposition; above 1.5 m/s increases wear and forces debris through openings.

• Headloss: Clean screen headloss 150-300mm (6-12 inches) at design flow. Cleaning cycle initiates at 600-900mm (24-36 inches) differential.

• Removal Efficiency: 85-95% capture of solids >6mm, 70-85% for materials >3mm. Actual performance depends on wastewater characteristics and bar spacing.

• Rotational Speed: 0.5-2.0 RPM during cleaning cycles. Continuous rotation at 0.1-0.5 RPM for high-solids applications.

• Power Requirements: 3-15 kW motors typical, with VFD control standard. Include 100% redundant drive systems for critical installations.

• What bar spacing matches your solids profile and downstream equipment protection needs? Analyze influent screening data to determine 6mm vs 10mm spacing. Wrong choice causes either excessive cleaning cycles (too fine) or pump damage (too coarse). Need 30-day solids characterization study including peak wet weather events.

• Should you specify continuous or intermittent cleaning operation? Facilities with >15% industrial contribution or high grease content typically require continuous rotation. Intermittent cleaning saves energy but risks blinding in high-solids conditions. Evaluate based on peak solids loading (kg/day) and available downstream storage.

• What level of automation and monitoring is justified? Basic differential pressure control costs $15K less than PLC-based systems with flow compensation, but manual intervention increases during storm events. Plants with limited staffing need automated wash systems and remote monitoring. Consider 5-year O&M cost differential.

• How many units provide optimal redundancy versus capital cost? Single large units (>5 MGD) create bypass risks during maintenance. Multiple smaller units increase complexity but provide operational flexibility. Evaluate based on allowable bypass duration and peak flow variability.

• Primary: Division 46 23 61 - Cylindrical Screens (Water Treatment Equipment)

• Secondary: Division 40 45 13 - Water Treatment Screening Equipment for preliminary treatment applications

• Material/Equipment Verification:

  • Confirm 316SS construction for all wetted components

  • Verify screen opening tolerance ±0.5mm maximum

  • Check motor ratings match site electrical specifications

• Installation Requirements:

  • Concrete channel tolerances critical - typically ±3mm

  • Overhead clearance needed for maintenance access

  • Bypass provisions required during installation

• Field Challenges:

  • Channel preparation often behind schedule

  • Electrical coordination with existing SCADA systems

  • Access platform integration with existing structures

• Coordination Issues:

  • Lead times typically 16-20 weeks for municipal equipment

  • Factory acceptance testing adds 2-4 weeks

• Headworks International - BioMag rotating drum screens, popular in 2-20 MGD plants

• Huber Technology - ROTAMAT RoK4 series, widely specified for municipal headworks

• JWC Environmental - Auger Monster and Monster screening systems for smaller facilities

• Lakeside Equipment - Raptor rotating drum screens, common in Midwest municipal installations

​

All maintain strong municipal references and provide standardized equipment packages.

• Fine bubble diffused aeration - Better for smaller plants (<2 MGD), 20-30% lower capital cost but higher O&M

• Static wedge wire screens - No moving parts, 40% lower cost but requires higher head and regular cleaning

• Traveling water screens - Better for larger flows (>20 MGD), similar cost but higher maintenance complexity

• Perforated plate screens - Lowest cost option but prone to plugging, suitable only for well-screened influent

Establish manufacturer service agreements upfront - spare parts availability varies significantly between suppliers. Consider standardizing on single manufacturer across multiple units for maintenance efficiency. Request factory training for 2-3 operators during commissioning. Negotiate bulk pricing when replacing multiple screens district-wide. Many manufacturers offer trade-in credits for older equipment, reducing overall project costs by 5-10%.