Dewatering Screw Presses

Dewatering screw presses mechanically remove water from biosolids and other sludges through continuous compression and filtration. Sludge enters the cylindrical screen where an internal screw conveys and progressively compresses the material, forcing water through perforations while discharged cake exits at higher solids concentration. Typical municipal installations achieve 18-25% solids content from 2-4% feed sludge, processing 50-500 GPM flows depending on unit size. The primary trade-off is lower cake solids compared to belt filter presses or centrifuges, requiring more downstream handling and disposal costs.

• Primary Sludge Dewatering: Screw presses handle primary clarifier underflow (2-4% solids) in plants 1-20 MGD, producing 15-20% solids cake. Selected for low polymer consumption (2-4 lb/dry ton) and minimal operator attention. Upstream: gravity thickeners or dissolved air flotation. Downstream: cake conveyor to dumpster or truck loading.
• Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) Processing: Treats secondary clarifier underflow after gravity belt thickening to 4-6% solids. Achieves 18-22% cake solids with moderate polymer dosing (4-8 lb/dry ton). Chosen over belt presses for enclosed operation and reduced odors in urban plants.
• Digested Sludge Dewatering: Processes anaerobic digester output (3-5% solids) producing 20-25% cake solids. Selected for handling variable feed conditions and grit content common in digested sludge. Often paired with cake storage silos for weekend operation.
• Septage/FOG Processing: Handles high-strength waste streams after screening and grit removal, producing 12-18% cake solids depending on feedstock variability.

Daily Operations: Operators monitor feed flow (10-150 gpm typical), polymer dosing rates, and cake consistency every 2-4 hours. Key adjustments include screw speed, back-pressure settings, and polymer feed rate based on visual cake assessment. Automated systems provide alarms for high torque, low flow, or polymer tank levels. Most units run continuously with minimal intervention.

​

Maintenance: Weekly bearing lubrication and screen inspection for blinding or wear. Monthly polymer system cleaning and calibration. Semi-annual screw conveyor alignment check and drive component service. Requires confined space entry procedures for internal inspection. Screen replacement typically needed every 12-18 months depending on grit loading. Maintenance staff need mechanical aptitude but not specialized training.

​

Troubleshooting: Common failures include screen blinding (reduced filtrate flow, wet cake), bearing wear (vibration, noise), and polymer system plugging (poor flocculation). Warning signs include increasing torque, declining throughput

• Screw Conveyor Assembly: Stainless steel screw (304 or 316SS) with decreasing pitch toward discharge, typically 9-36 inch diameter. Helical flights compress sludge while conveying. Variable speed drive (0.5-5 RPM) allows throughput adjustment. Sizing based on 8-12 cubic yards/hour per foot of screw diameter.
• Perforated Screen Cylinder: 304SS wedge-wire construction with 0.25-0.75mm slot openings. Length-to-diameter ratio of 3:1 to 5:1 provides adequate retention time. Screen selection balances capture efficiency with blinding resistance.
• Polymer Injection System: Positive displacement pumps deliver diluted polymer (0.25-0.5% active) at 2-15 gpm. Multiple injection points along feed zone ensure proper mixing. Includes polymer preparation tanks with 30-60 minute aging time.
• Cake Discharge Mechanism: Spring-loaded or pneumatic back-pressure system maintains 5-50 PSI discharge pressure. Adjustable cone or restrictor plate controls cake dryness and throughput balance.

• Hydraulic Loading Rate: 40-120 gpm/ft of screen width, with 60-80 gpm/ft typical for municipal applications. Exceeding 120 gpm/ft reduces capture efficiency below 85%.
• Solids Loading Rate: 400-800 lbs dry solids/hr/ft of screen width. Primary clarifier sludge operates at lower end (400-600 lbs/hr/ft), while waste activated sludge handles higher rates (600-800 lbs/hr/ft).
• Feed Solids Concentration: 0.5-6% for raw sludge, up to 12% for polymer-conditioned feed. Higher concentrations improve dewatering but require increased torque capacity.
• Cake Dryness: 15-25% solids typical, with 18-22% achievable on municipal biosolids. Polymer dosing of 8-15 lbs/dry ton significantly impacts final dryness.
• Screen Opening: 0.25-0.75mm wedge wire openings. Smaller openings (0.25-0.5mm) provide better capture but higher maintenance. Larger openings (0.5-0.75mm) reduce plugging risk.
• Differential Speed: 1-15 rpm between inner screw and outer basket. Higher differentials increase throughput but reduce residence time and cake dryness.
• Wash Water Flow: 2-8 gpm/ft of screen width for backwash cleaning, typically automated on 15-30 minute cycles.

• What feed solids concentration and polymer dosing strategy will optimize cake dryness versus chemical costs? Municipal plants achieving >20% cake solids typically dose 10-15 lbs polymer/dry ton at feed concentrations of 2-4%. Under-dosing (<8 lbs/ton) results in poor capture and wet cake. Over-dosing (>18 lbs/ton) increases costs without proportional benefit. Requires jar testing with actual sludge and proposed polymers.
• Should design prioritize maximum throughput or highest cake dryness for disposal cost optimization? High-rate operation (>100 gpm/ft width) achieves 15-18% cake solids but maximizes hydraulic capacity. Conservative loading (60-80 gpm/ft) produces 20-25% solids, reducing disposal tonnage by 15-25%. Decision depends on disposal costs versus capital equipment requirements.
• What level of automation and redundancy is justified for this critical dewatering application? Single units handling >50% of plant capacity require backup systems or oversized parallel units. Full automation with polymer feed control adds $75,000-150,000 but reduces operator labor by 2-4 hours/day. Manual operation acceptable for smaller plants with operator coverage.
• How will seasonal sludge characteristics affect year-round performance consistency? Winter operations often see 10-15% reduction in cake dryness due to temperature effects on polymer performance and biological activity. Requires polymer system flexibility and potentially increased dosing capacity during cold weather months.

• Primary: Division 46 - Water an

• Material/Equipment Verification: Verify 316SS construction for all wetted parts, Confirm polymer injection system compatibility, Review motor sizing for peak solids loading
• Installation Requirements: Concrete pad with vibration isolation, 480V/3-phase power with VFD capability, Washwater connection (40-60 PSI minimum), Polymer feed system integration
• Field Challenges: Access for screen removal/maintenance, Cake discharge conveyor alignment, Polymer line routing without dead legs
• Coordination Issues: Interface with upstream thickening equipment, SCADA integration for automated operation, Lead times typically 16-20 weeks for municipal units

• ANDRITZ - SEPRATOR screw presses, widely used in 1-50 MGD facilities with proven municipal track record
• Huber Technology - ROTAMAT RoS3 series, popular for smaller plants (0.5-10 MGD) with compact footprint requirements
• FKC - Co., Ltd. screw presses, gaining traction in North American municipal market
• Kurita - KS series, established presence in larger municipal facilities (10+ MGD)

• Belt Filter Presses - Better for variable solids loading, higher cake dryness (22-28%), but require more operator attention and maintenance. Capital costs similar.
• Centrifuges - Higher throughput capacity, automated operation, but significantly higher power consumption and maintenance costs (2-3x operating expense).
• Rotary Drum Thickeners - Lower capital cost for thickening-only applications, but limited dewatering capability (12-16% solids maximum).

Establish direct relationships with manufacturer service technicians early - they provide invaluable troubleshooting support and optimization guidance. Many municipalities negotiate service contracts including annual inspections and wear part replacement. Consider purchasing spare screens and wear components during initial procurement to avoid extended downtime. Polymer optimization typically reduces operating costs by 15-25% within first six months of operation.