Dry Chemical Storage Silos
Overview
Dry Chemical Storage Silos are bulk storage vessels that house powdered treatment chemicals like lime, soda ash, or polymer, feeding them to downstream metering equipment through controlled discharge systems. These cylindrical steel or concrete structures use gravity flow with mechanical agitation to prevent bridging and ensure consistent material flow to chemical feed systems. Typical municipal installations range from 50 to 500 cubic yards capacity, providing 7-30 days of chemical storage depending on plant size and dosing requirements. The primary trade-off involves balancing storage capacity against material degradation risks, as extended storage can cause chemical caking, moisture absorption, and reduced treatment effectiveness.
Common Applications
• Water Treatment Coagulation Systems (2-25 MGD plants): Silos store aluminum sulfate, ferric chloride, or polymer powders for primary coagulation. Connected upstream to pneumatic conveying systems and downstream to dry chemical feeders with dissolution tanks. Selected for bulk delivery cost savings (20-30% vs. bagged chemicals) and reduced labor handling 50-100 tons monthly.
• Lime Softening Operations (5-50 MGD facilities): Store quicklime or hydrated lime for hardness removal and pH adjustment. Integrated with lime slakers and fed to rapid mix basins. Chosen for high-volume applications requiring 2-10 tons daily, where silo storage prevents moisture absorption that degrades bagged lime.
• Wastewater Phosphorus Removal (1-20 MGD plants): House ferric chloride or aluminum sulfate for chemical precipitation. Fed to biological reactors or tertiary clarifiers via screw conveyors and volumetric feeders. Selected when discharge limits require consistent chemical addition exceeding 500 lb/day, making bulk storage economical.
• Biosolids Conditioning (0.5-15 MGD plants): Store polymer powder or lime for dewatering enhancement. Connected to polymer makeup systems feeding belt presses or centrifuges. Preferred for facilities processing over 2,000 lb/day dry solids where consistent chemical quality impacts cake solids performance.
Operator Experience
Daily Operations: Operators monitor silo levels via SCADA, checking for bridging or rat-holing through visual ports. Chemical feed rates require adjustment based on raw water quality changes, typically 2-3 times per shift. Dust collector pressure differential monitoring ensures proper ventilation during material discharge.
Maintenance: Monthly inspection of conveying system wear points and quarterly dust collector bag replacement. Confined space entry procedures required for annual silo cleaning, demanding gas monitoring equipment and rescue teams. Vibrator maintenance every 6 months prevents material bridging. Level sensor calibration quarterly maintains accurate inventory tracking.
Troubleshooting: Material bridging manifests as erratic feeder operation or flow stoppage, resolved through air cannon activation or manual prodding. Dust collector high differential pressure indicates bag blinding or overloading.
Major Components
• Silo Structure: Carbon steel or concrete construction, 100-1,500 cubic foot capacity typical for municipal applications. Sized for 7-30 day chemical storage based on delivery schedules. Selection factors include chemical compatibility, seismic requirements, and foundation constraints.
• Pneumatic Conveying System: Dilute-phase systems with rotary airlocks, blowers (15-50 HP), and 4-6 inch conveying lines. Materials include stainless steel for corrosive chemicals. Sized for 2-20 tons/hour transfer rates matching truck unloading requirements.
• Dust Collection Equipment: Baghouse filters with 99.5% efficiency, sized 500-5,000 CFM for filling operations. PTFE membrane bags for sticky chemicals, polyester for standard applications. Critical for regulatory compliance and operator safety.
• Level Indication: Ultrasonic or radar sensors for continuous monitoring, plus high/low level switches. Backup mechanical indicators prevent overfilling during deliveries.
• Discharge Systems: Mass flow or funnel flow designs with vibrators or air cannons. Screw conveyors (6-24 inch diameter) or pneumatic systems for material transfer to feeders.
Design Criteria
• Storage Capacity: 7-30 days chemical supply based on maximum daily usage. Typical municipal plants: 200-2,000 cubic feet for lime, 100-800 cubic feet for soda ash.
• Material Flow Properties: Angle of repose 35-45° for lime, 30-40° for soda ash. Bulk density 50-65 lb/ft³ lime, 58-68 lb/ft³ soda ash. Design for 1.5x bulk density safety factor.
• Discharge Rates: 50-500 lb/hr for 0.5-5 MGD plants, 500-3,000 lb/hr for 5-25 MGD plants, up to 8,000 lb/hr for 50 MGD facilities. Minimum 4:1 turndown ratio required.
• Structural Loading: Wind load per ASCE 7, seismic per local codes. Foundation loading 150-300 psf typical. Include 50% overpressure for pneumatic filling.
• Environmental: Operating temperature -20°F to 120°F. Humidity resistance for outdoor installations. Dust collection efficiency >99.5% per EPA requirements.
• Access Requirements: 8-foot minimum clearance around silo base. Truck access for 25-ton pneumatic delivery vehicles. Fall protection per OSHA 1926.501 for maintenance access above 6 feet.
Key Design Decisions
• What storage capacity ensures reliable operation without excessive inventory costs? Calculate 14-21 day supply at maximum treatment rates plus 20% safety margin. Under-sizing risks treatment interruptions during delivery delays or high demand periods. Over-sizing increases capital costs and material degradation. Need historical chemical usage data and delivery logistics analysis.
• Should the silo use pneumatic or mechanical discharge systems? Pneumatic systems handle 50-2,000 lb/hr with ±2% accuracy, suitable for automated plants. Mechanical systems (screw/belt) handle 100-8,000 lb/hr with ±5% accuracy, better for high-volume applications. Wrong choice affects feed accuracy, maintenance requirements, and power consumption. Requires flow rate analysis and automation level assessment.
• What level monitoring and dust collection systems are required? Level monitoring needs 4-20mA output with ±1% accuracy for inventory management. Dust collection must meet EPA opacity standards (<10%). Inadequate systems cause regulatory violations, material waste, and safety hazards. Need local air quality regulations and plant automation requirements.
• How should foundation and structural design address site conditions? Foundation must handle 150-300 psf loading plus wind/seismic per local codes. Inadequate design causes settlement, structural failure, or equipment misalignment. Need geotechnical report and local building codes analysis.
Specification Section
• Primary: Division 46 23 13 - Chemical Storage Equipment
• Secondary: Division 40 42 00 - Process Storage Tanks (for structural components)
• Chemical storage silos fall under water treatment equipment specifications with specific requirements for dry chemical handling, dust control, and automated discharge systems.
Submittal + Construction Considerations
• Material/Equipment Verification: Verify silo material certificates (316SS for corrosive chemicals), Confirm dust collection system CFM ratings match chemical properties, Review structural calculations for seismic and wind loads
• Installation Requirements: Foundation curing time adds 2-4 weeks to schedule, Crane access for silo placement (typically 60-80 foot reach required), Electrical coordination for level sensors and dust collection
• Field Challenges: Weather delays during silo erection, Alignment issues between silo discharge and feed equipment
• Coordination Issues: HVAC integration for temperature control, Process piping conflicts with structural supports
• Lead times typically 16-20 weeks for custom municipal silos
Popular Manufacturers and Models
• Hapman - HapSilo series with capacities from 50-2,000 cubic feet for lime and polymer applications
• FLSmidth - Fuller-Kinyon pumps with integrated silos, popular for lime slaking systems
• Schenck Process - AccuRate feeders with matching storage silos, common in 5-500 MGD plants
• Claudius Peters - Pneumatic conveying systems with integral storage, frequently specified for polymer handling at larger facilities
Alternative Equipment
• Bulk bags/super sacks cost 40-60% less initially but require frequent handling labor, suitable for <2 MGD plants using <50 tons/month
• Outdoor storage bins with weather protection cost 20-30% less than silos, acceptable for non-critical chemicals in mild climates
• Underground storage hoppers eliminate structural loads but complicate maintenance access, sometimes specified for aesthetic reasons in residential areas
Real-World Tips
Establish relationships with local concrete suppliers early - foundation work often becomes critical path. Consider oversizing dust collection systems by 25% beyond calculated requirements; municipal chemicals tend to be dustier than manufacturer specifications assume. Specify redundant level indication (ultrasonic plus vibrating rod) to prevent costly chemical outages. Many operators prefer manual butterfly valves over automated systems for reliability during maintenance periods.
Connect with a Local Distributor
If you need help with sizing, system compatibility, maintenance planning, or sourcing, connect with your local manufacturer's representative. They can assist you in selecting the right equipment for your specific application and site conditions.
