Ozone Generating and Feed Systems
Overview
Ozone generating and feed systems produce and deliver ozone gas for disinfection and oxidation in municipal water and wastewater treatment plants. These systems use electrical discharge (corona discharge) or UV light to convert oxygen into ozone (O₃), then dissolve it into water through contactors, mixers, or diffusers. Typical ozone generation rates range from 5-50 pounds per day for smaller municipal plants. The primary trade-off is high electrical energy consumption (8-15 kWh per pound of ozone produced) combined with ozone's short half-life requiring immediate use and sophisticated monitoring systems.
Common Applications
• Primary Disinfection (2-50 MGD): Ozone systems replace chlorine for final effluent disinfection, achieving 4-log virus reduction with 1-4 mg/L dose and 10-minute contact time. Located after secondary clarifiers, upstream of UV polishing or chlorine residual addition. Selected for superior pathogen inactivation and reduced DBP formation.
• Taste and Odor Control (0.5-20 MGD): Pre-ozonation at raw water intake removes geosmin and MIB compounds that cause earthy/musty tastes. Typical dose 0.5-2.0 mg/L upstream of coagulation/flocculation. Selected when seasonal algae blooms overwhelm conventional treatment or when powdered activated carbon costs become prohibitive.
• Color Removal and Organics Reduction (1-25 MGD): Ozone oxidizes complex organics and reduces true color in surface waters with high natural organic matter. Applied at 2-6 mg/L before conventional treatment, reducing coagulant demand by 20-40%. Selected for challenging source waters where enhanced coagulation alone is insufficient.
Operator Experience
Daily Operations: Operators monitor ozone residuals using colorimetric or electrochemical analyzers, adjusting generator output to maintain 0.1-0.5 mg/L residual in effluent. Check oxygen purity, generator cooling water temperature, and contact chamber water levels. Log CT values hourly for disinfection credit verification and regulatory reporting.
Maintenance: Weekly cleaning of diffusers and monthly calibration of residual analyzers. Quarterly replacement of generator electrodes or UV lamps depending on system type. Requires confined space training for contact chamber entry and electrical safety certification for high-voltage generator work. Annual professional service for oxygen generation equipment.
Troubleshooting: Low residuals indicate fouled diffusers, generator electrode degradation, or oxygen purity issues. High residuals suggest flow measurement problems or analyzer drift. Generator arcing indicates moisture infiltration or electrode wear. Typical electrode life 8,000-12,000 hours; UV lamps require replacement every 12-18 months depending on operating hours and water quality.
Major Components
• Ozone Generator: Corona discharge or UV generators produce O3 from oxygen feed gas. Municipal units range 5-500 lb/day capacity with 6-12% concentration by weight. Stainless steel construction with integrated cooling systems. Selection based on peak demand, redundancy requirements, and power costs.
• Contact Chamber: Concrete or stainless steel vessels provide 10-20 minute detention time with fine bubble diffusion. Typical sizing 0.5-2.0 gal/gpm with multiple stages for plug flow. Includes ozone destruction units for off-gas treatment meeting 0.1 ppm discharge limits.
• Oxygen Feed System: PSA oxygen generators or liquid oxygen storage supply 90-95% pure O2. PSA units sized 50-2000 SCFH for smaller plants; LOX systems for facilities >20 MGD. Includes backup compressors, dryers, and pressure regulation.
• Process Control System: PLC-based controls monitor residual ozone, flow rates, and generator performance. Includes CT calculation, dose pacing, and safety interlocks. Features remote monitoring capabilities and data logging for regulatory compliance.
Design Criteria
• Ozone Generation Capacity: 5-500 lbs O₃/day for 0.5-50 MGD plants, with 2.0-6.0 mg/L typical dosing ranges for disinfection and 8-15 mg/L for advanced oxidation processes.
• Power Requirements: Corona discharge systems require 8-15 kWh/lb O₃ produced, with UV systems at 25-35 kWh/lb O₃. Electrical supply typically 480V, 3-phase.
• Feed Gas Flow: Oxygen feed systems operate at 15-25 SCFM per 10 lbs O₃/day capacity. Air-fed systems require 3-4 times higher flow rates but lower capital costs.
• Operating Pressure: Generation chambers operate at 5-15 psig. Contact chambers require 10-25 psig to maintain dissolved ozone concentrations of 0.3-0.8 mg/L residual.
• Cooling Requirements: Process cooling water at 2-5 GPM per 10 lbs O₃/day capacity to maintain generator temperatures below 40°F for optimal efficiency.
• Ozone Concentration: Corona discharge produces 1-6% by weight in oxygen, 0.5-2% in air. Higher concentrations improve mass transfer efficiency but increase safety requirements.
• Contact Time: CT values of 0.5-3.0 mg-min/L for 2-4 log virus inactivation, requiring 10-20 minute contact chambers at typical dosing rates.
Key Design Decisions
• Should we specify oxygen-fed or air-fed ozone generation for our application? Oxygen-fed systems produce 2-3x higher ozone concentrations (3-6% vs 1-2%) and require 60% less power per pound of ozone, but add $50,000-100,000 in oxygen equipment costs for plants >5 MGD. Air-fed systems work well for smaller plants (<2 MGD) with lower ozone demands and simpler maintenance requirements.
• What ozone generator sizing philosophy should we adopt - peak demand or average demand with turndown? Modern corona discharge units turn down to 10-20% capacity while maintaining efficiency. Sizing for average demand (typically 60-70% of peak) with 5:1 turndown capability reduces capital costs by 20-30% but requires careful evaluation of peak disinfection requirements and backup chlorination systems.
• How should we configure the contact system - co-current or counter-current flow? Counter-current contact chambers achieve 85-95% ozone utilization versus 70-80% for co-current systems, reducing ozone demand by 15-25%. However, counter-current requires more complex hydraulics and higher head loss (3-6 feet vs 1-3 feet), impacting pump sizing and energy costs.
• What ozone destruction method should we specify for off-gas treatment? Thermal destruction handles 95-99% destruction efficiency but requires 1,500-2,000°F operation with high energy costs ($0.10-0.15/lb O₃). Catalytic destruction operates at 200-400°F.
Specification Section
• Not provided in source material
Submittal + Construction Considerations
• Material/Equipment Verification: Verify ozone generator capacity at actual operating conditions, confirm electrical requirements match site power availability, check ambient temperature derating factors
• Installation Requirements: Dedicated ozone-resistant HVAC system required, minimum 6-month lead times for custom generators, specialized ozone piping materials (316L SS minimum)
• Field Challenges: Ozone leak detection system integration, precise flow measurement for CT calculations
• Coordination Issues: Early electrical coordination for high-power requirements, HVAC contractor familiarity with ozone-resistant materials
Popular Manufacturers and Models
• Xylem (WEDECO): DURON series generators, widely used in 1-50 MGD plants
• Ozonia (Suez): TOGC and CFS series, strong municipal presence
• Mitsubishi Electric: OZAT generators, reliable for medium-sized facilities
• Primozone: RENA series, gaining traction in smaller municipalities
• All offer standard skid-mounted packages for municipal applications
Alternative Equipment
• UV Disinfection: Lower operating costs, no chemical handling. Preferred for facilities with good upstream treatment.
• Chlorine Dioxide: Better CT efficiency than ozone, handles taste/odor. Higher chemical complexity.
• Advanced Oxidation (UV/H2O2): Superior for micropollutant removal. Roughly 2-3x ozone capital cost.
• Biological Filtration: Natural alternative for taste/odor, much lower cost but requires more space and time.
Real-World Tips
Generator Sizing: Size for 150% of design dose to accommodate varying water quality - saves costly upgrades later. Manufacturer Relationships: Establish service agreements upfront; ozone generator repairs require factory-trained technicians. Cost Savings: Consider oxygen concentrators versus LOX for smaller facilities (<5 MGD) - eliminates delivery logistics and provides operational flexibility despite higher power costs.
Connect with a Local Distributor
If you need help with sizing, system compatibility, maintenance planning, or sourcing, connect with your local manufacturer's representative. They can assist you in selecting the right equipment for your specific application and site conditions.
