Rapid Mixers

Rapid mixers provide instantaneous, high-intensity mixing of chemical coagulants with raw water in municipal treatment plants, creating uniform dispersion within 10-30 seconds through mechanical agitation or hydraulic turbulence. These units achieve velocity gradients (G-values) of 700-1000 s⁻¹ to maximize coagulant effectiveness and particle destabilization. The primary trade-off involves balancing sufficient mixing intensity to ensure complete chemical dispersion against excessive energy input that can shear fragile floc particles, reducing downstream clarification efficiency.

• Chemical Feed Points: Rapid mixers immediately follow chemical injection points for coagulants (alum, ferric chloride), pH adjustment (lime, caustic), and disinfectants (chlorine, chloramine). Located after chemical feed pumps but before flocculation basins. Selected for 10-30 second detention times ensuring complete dispersion before slower mixing downstream.

• Influent Treatment: Raw water intake facilities use rapid mixers for pre-treatment chemical addition, particularly for taste/odor control with powdered activated carbon or potassium permanganate. Positioned between intake screens and sedimentation processes.

• Secondary Treatment: Wastewater plants employ rapid mixers for polymer addition before dewatering operations and for mixing return activated sludge with primary effluent. Critical for maintaining proper F/M ratios in 2-25 MGD activated sludge systems.

• Disinfection Contact: Pre-chlorination rapid mixers ensure uniform chlorine distribution before contact chambers, achieving required CT values for pathogen inactivation per EPA Surface Water Treatment Rule.

Daily Operations: Operators monitor amperage draw (typically 5-25 HP range) and observe mixing patterns through sight glasses or open chambers. VFD adjustments match chemical feed rates - increasing speed during high turbidity events or reducing during low flows. Power consumption indicates proper impeller submergence and mechanical condition.

​

Maintenance: Monthly bearing lubrication and quarterly alignment checks prevent premature failure. Annual impeller inspection requires confined space entry procedures with full PPE including gas monitors. Mechanical seal replacement every 3-5 years requires millwright skills. VFD maintenance includes annual electrical testing and cooling system cleaning.

​

Troubleshooting: Excessive vibration indicates bearing wear or impeller damage - typically occurring after 8-12 years. Reduced mixing effectiveness shows impeller erosion or improper submergence. Motor overloading suggests mechanical binding or debris accumulation. Seal leakage creates safety hazards requiring immediate shutdown. Service life averages 15-20 years with proper maintenance.

• Impeller Assembly: Axial or radial flow designs generating 200-1000 ft-lb/1000 gal mixing intensity. Stainless steel 316L construction standard. Diameter typically 20-40% of tank width. Selection based on required G-values (300-3000 sec⁻¹) and chemical compatibility.

• Variable Speed Drive: VFDs enable G-value optimization for varying flows and chemical dosages. Standard 480V, NEMA 4X enclosures for outdoor installations. Sized 25-50% above calculated power requirements for process flexibility.

• Mixing Chamber: Concrete or steel tanks with 10-60 second detention times. Baffled designs prevent short-circuiting. Typical depths 8-16 feet for 0.5-50 MGD applications. Inlet/outlet positioning creates plug flow hydraulics.

• Shaft/Bearing System: Stainless steel shafts with mechanical seals or stuffing boxes. Thrust bearings handle vertical loads. Critical clearances prevent cavitation and ensure 15-20 year service life with proper maintenance.

• Hydraulic Parameters: Detention time: 10-60 seconds (typical 30 seconds for coagulation); Velocity gradient (G): 400-1,000 sec⁻¹ (700-800 sec⁻¹ optimal for alum); Camp number (Gt): 20,000-100,000 (30,000-50,000 typical); Flow velocity: 0.5-3.0 fps through mixing zone

• Power Requirements: Power density: 50-300 HP/MG (150-200 HP/MG typical); Impeller tip speed: 8-15 fps maximum; Motor sizing: 1.5-2.0 safety factor on calculated power

• Physical Constraints: Basin depth: 8-20 feet (12-16 feet typical); Length-to-width ratio: 1:1 to 3:1; Freeboard: minimum 2 feet above high water level; Chemical feed point: within 2 feet of impeller discharge

• Performance Standards: Mixing efficiency: >95% uniformity in 90% of detention time; Floc formation time: 15-45 seconds for conventional coagulants; Turndown capability: 25-100% of design flow with variable speed drives

• What mixing intensity is required for the selected coagulant chemistry? Ferric sulfate requires G-values of 600-800 sec⁻¹, while polymer coagulants need only 200-400 sec⁻¹. Over-mixing ferric can cause pin floc; under-mixing polymers results in poor coagulation. Need jar testing data and coagulant manufacturer recommendations.

• Should mechanical or hydraulic mixing be specified for this flow range? Mechanical mixers are cost-effective below 10 MGD but require regular maintenance. Hydraulic mixers (static mixers, baffled channels) work well above 5 MGD with minimal maintenance but higher headloss. Consider long-term O&M capabilities and power costs.

• What level of mixing redundancy is required? Single mixer acceptable for <2 MGD plants with bypass capability. Dual mixers recommended for 2-10 MGD. Multiple parallel trains required above 10 MGD per AWWA standards. Consider consequences of mixer failure on downstream treatment.

• How will chemical feed be integrated with mixing equipment? Feed point location affects mixing efficiency by 15-25%. Multiple feed points improve distribution but increase complexity. Need chemical feed rates, injection velocities, and mixer hydraulic modeling data.

• Primary: Division 40-05-23 - Water Treatment Plant Rapid Mixing Equipment

• Secondary: Division 40-05-13 - Water Treatment Plant Pumping and Mixing Equipment (for mechanical systems)

• Division 40-01-10 covers general water treatment requirements and performance standards

• Material/Equipment Verification: Verify 316SS construction for all wetted parts; Confirm motor ratings match specified G-values; Check impeller materials and coatings

• Installation Requirements: Coordinate electrical rough-in with motor locations; Verify concrete anchor bolt templates early; Plan crane access for mixer installation

• Field Challenges: Achieving specified detention times with actual flow patterns; Motor alignment and vibration issues; Access for maintenance in confined spaces

• Coordination Issues: Interface with chemical feed systems timing; SCADA integration requirements; Lead times: 12-16 weeks typical, 20+ weeks for custom configurations

• Evoqua Water Technologies: FlashMix series (paddle and turbine configurations)

• Xylem/Flygt: Concertor mixers and static mixers for smaller applications

• WesTech Engineering: Rapid mix systems integrated with clarifier packages

• Lakeside Equipment: Raptor mixers, popular in packaged plant applications

• All maintain strong municipal references with installations from 1-50 MGD range

• Static Mixers: Lower maintenance, no moving parts; preferred for smaller plants <2 MGD or retrofit applications. Cost: 30-50% less than mechanical mixers.

• Jet Mixers: Pneumatic operation, good for remote sites without reliable power. Higher operating costs but lower capital investment.

• In-line Blenders: For very small applications <0.5 MGD. Compact footprint but limited mixing intensity. Cost comparable to static mixers but higher pressure losses.

Maintenance Access: Specify removable mixers even if initially more expensive - saves thousands in future maintenance costs. Manufacturer Support: Establish direct relationships with regional reps for faster troubleshooting response. Cost Savings: Consider standardizing on single manufacturer across multiple units for parts inventory reduction. Sizing: Size for 1.5x average flow rather than peak - prevents over-mixing during typical operations while maintaining flexibility.