Sequencing Batch Reactors

Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBRs) provide biological wastewater treatment by cycling through fill, react, settle, and decant phases within a single tank system. During the react phase, mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentrations typically range from 3,000-5,000 mg/L while achieving BOD5 removal efficiencies of 95-98% and total suspended solids removal of 90-95%. SBRs eliminate the need for separate primary and secondary clarifiers by combining biological treatment and solids separation in one vessel. The primary trade-off is reduced treatment capacity during settle and decant phases, requiring multiple tanks or larger sizing compared to conventional activated sludge systems.

• Small Municipal WWTPs (0.5-5 MGD): SBRs excel in smaller plants where simplicity and operational flexibility outweigh economies of scale. They receive primary effluent and provide complete secondary treatment in a single basin, eliminating separate clarifiers. Selected for reduced footprint, simplified operations, and ability to handle flow variations without dedicated equalization.

• Nutrient Removal Facilities: SBRs achieve biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal through programmed anaerobic, anoxic, and aerobic phases within each cycle. Plants facing stringent discharge limits (TN <3 mg/L, TP <0.5 mg/L) utilize SBRs for their inherent process flexibility and ability to optimize reaction times based on influent loading.

• Upgrade/Expansion Projects: Existing plants add SBR basins to increase capacity or improve treatment performance. They integrate easily with existing headworks and can operate independently during construction phases, making them ideal for phased expansions at 2-15 MGD facilities.

Daily Operations: Operators monitor cycle timing, effluent quality, and MLSS concentrations (typically 2,500-4,500 mg/L). Key adjustments include aeration duration based on dissolved oxygen profiles, settle time modifications for SVI changes, and decant volume optimization. Most facilities run 4-6 hour cycles with automated sequencing requiring minimal intervention during normal conditions.

​

Maintenance: Diffuser cleaning quarterly using formic acid or mechanical brushing requires confined space entry procedures and full respiratory protection. Decanter mechanisms need monthly lubrication and annual seal replacement. Blower maintenance follows manufacturer schedules (typically 4,000-8,000 hour intervals). Operators need basic electrical troubleshooting skills and understanding of pneumatic controls.

​

Troubleshooting: Poor settling indicates filamentous growth or shock loading - adjust F/M ratio or cycle timing. Decanter problems show as high effluent TSS or floating solids carryover. Aeration system failures present as low DO or poor mixing.

• Aeration System: Fine-bubble diffusers (typically EPDM membrane) provide process air during react phases. Sizing ranges 6-12 SCFM per 1000 gallons basin volume. Selection factors include oxygen transfer efficiency (2.5-4.0 lbs O2/hp-hr), mixing capability, and energy costs. Most municipal installations use rotary blowers with VFD control.

• Decanter Assembly: Floating or fixed decanters remove clarified effluent during draw phases. Floating types (Parkson, Evoqua) handle 2-8 feet water level variation, sized for 25-50% basin volume removal per cycle. Critical factors include weir loading rates (<10,000 gpd/ft), scum baffle design, and corrosion-resistant materials (316 SS minimum).

• Basin Configuration: Concrete basins typically sized 8-15 feet depth with 2:1-4:1 length-to-width ratios. Volume ranges 50,000-500,000 gallons per basin for municipal applications. Design considerations include mixing patterns, solids settling characteristics, and access for maintenance equipment.

• Control System: PLC-based systems (Allen-Bradley, Siemens) manage cycle timing, valve sequencing, and process monitoring. Include SCADA integration, alarm functions, and data logging capabilities essential for regulatory reporting and optimization.

• Hydraulic Loading: Design flow: 0.5-50 MGD capacity range, Peak factor: 2.5-4.0 times average daily flow, Cycle time: 4-8 hours typical (6 hours standard), Fill ratio: 25-33% of total cycle time, Decant ratio: 10-15% of total cycle time

• Process Loading: Organic loading: 20-40 lb BOD₅/1000 ft³/day, Volumetric loading: 0.05-0.15 lb BOD₅/ft³/day, F/M ratio: 0.05-0.30 lb BOD₅/lb MLSS/day, SRT: 5-25 days (10-15 days typical), MLSS concentration: 2,000-4,000 mg/L

• Physical Parameters: Basin depth: 12-20 feet (16 feet typical), Freeboard: 2-3 feet minimum, Number of basins: Minimum 2 (3-4 preferred for >5 MGD), Decanter capacity: 15-25% above peak hourly flow, Aeration intensity: 15-25 SCFM/1000 gallons during react phase

• Performance Criteria: BOD₅ removal: >95% (typical effluent <10 mg/L), TSS removal: >95% (typical effluent <15 mg/L), Nitrification efficiency: >90% when designed for nutrient removal

• How many SBR basins are required for reliable operation? Minimum 2 basins for plants <2 MGD; 3-4 basins for larger facilities. Undersizing basin count forces longer cycle times during peak flows, reducing treatment efficiency and increasing effluent violations. Need: peak flow data, required cycle flexibility, maintenance downtime requirements.

• What decanter type and capacity should be specified? Floating decanters handle 15-20% above average flow; fixed decanters require 25% excess capacity. Undersized decanting creates hydraulic bottlenecks and forces cycle extensions. Oversized units increase capital costs 15-25%. Need: detailed flow profiles, effluent quality targets, site-specific head requirements.

• Should the system include biological nutrient removal capabilities? Adding BNR requires 20-30% additional basin volume, supplemental carbon sources, and modified aeration controls. Without BNR design, retrofit costs increase 40-60%. Over-designing for unnecessary nutrient removal increases construction costs 25-35%. Need: current and future discharge limits, receiving water sensitivity, carbon source availability.

• What level of process automation and control is appropriate? Basic PLC control adequate for <5 MGD plants; SCADA integration recommended above 10 MGD. Under-automating increases operator labor 2-3x and reduces process consistency. Over-automating small plants increases O&M costs without proportional benefits. Need: staffing levels, operator experience, budget constraints

• Design flow: 0.5-50 MGD capacity range

• Cycle time: 4-8 hours typical (6 hours standard)

• Basin depth: 12-20 feet (16 feet typical)

• MLSS concentration: 2,000-4,000 mg/L

• BOD₅ removal: >95% (typical effluent <10 mg/L)

• TSS removal: >95% (typical effluent <15 mg/L)

• Decanter materials: 316SS minimum

• Aeration intensity: 15-25 SCFM/1000 gallons during react phase

• Material/Equipment Verification: Verify decanter mechanism materials (316SS minimum), Confirm aeration system specifications and warranty terms, Review control system compatibility with existing SCADA

• Installation Requirements: Level concrete pads critical for decanter operation, Electrical coordination for variable frequency drives, Adequate crane access for decanter installation

• Field Challenges: Decanter alignment during startup, Control system programming complexity

• Coordination Issues: 16-20 week lead times for custom decanter systems

• Evoqua Water Technologies - OMNIFLO series for 0.5-20 MGD applications

• Xylem - Sanitaire SBR systems with fine-bubble aeration

• Aqua-Aerobic Systems - AquaSBR with proprietary decanter technology

• Smith & Loveless - TITAN SBR packages for smaller municipalities (0.1-5 MGD)

• All maintain strong municipal references and standardized equipment packages

• Extended Aeration - Lower O&M complexity, 15-20% higher construction cost, better for plants under 2 MGD

• Membrane Bioreactors (MBR) - Superior effluent quality, 40-60% higher capital cost, ideal for tight discharge limits

• Oxidation Ditches - Proven reliability, similar capital cost, preferred for plants over 5 MGD with available land area

Establish direct relationships with manufacturer service technicians during commissioning - SBR control systems require ongoing optimization that local contractors often can't provide. Specify redundant level sensors for decanter control; single-point failures cause permit violations. Consider lifecycle costs: SBRs have lower construction costs but higher O&M expenses than conventional activated sludge due to specialized equipment maintenance requirements.