Swing Check Valves
Overview
Swing check valves prevent reverse flow in municipal water and wastewater systems by using a hinged disc that swings open under forward flow pressure and closes automatically when flow stops or reverses. The valve operates passively without external controls, with the disc pivoting on a hinge pin mounted above the centerline of the valve body. Typical pressure drop ranges from 0.5 to 2.0 psi at normal operating velocities of 5-8 fps in municipal applications. The key trade-off is potential water hammer during rapid closure, as the disc can slam shut when flow reverses quickly, requiring careful system design and sometimes external dampening mechanisms.
Common Applications
• Raw Water Pump Discharge Lines (2-36 inch): Swing checks prevent reverse flow when pumps shut down, protecting against water hammer and pump damage. Located immediately downstream of each pump, upstream of isolation valves. Selected for low headloss (0.5-2 psi) and reliable sealing under 50-150 psi discharge pressures.
• Finished Water Pump Stations (4-48 inch): Installed on high service pump discharge headers to prevent backflow from elevated storage tanks. Positioned between pump and check valve vault, upstream of flow meters. Chosen for silent operation and minimal pressure drop during peak demand periods (2-15 MGD flow rates).
• Backwash Water Supply (6-24 inch): Prevents contaminated backwash water from entering clean water systems during filter operations. Located upstream of backwash pumps or gravity feed lines. Selected for tight shutoff and ability to handle intermittent flow cycling every 24-72 hours.
Operator Experience
Daily Operations: Visual inspection of external hinge movement during pump start/stop cycles. Monitor for unusual noise or vibration indicating disc flutter or incomplete closure. Check for external leakage at body joints. No routine adjustments required during normal operation.
Maintenance: Annual inspection of hinge mechanism lubrication, typically requiring confined space entry procedures and full PPE. Seat inspection every 3-5 years through valve disassembly - requires millwright skills and 4-8 hour outage. Disc replacement intervals vary from 8-15 years depending on water quality and cycling frequency.
Troubleshooting: Chattering noise indicates insufficient flow velocity or worn hinge pins. Water hammer during pump shutdown suggests disc closing too rapidly - adjust counterweight or install slow-closing retrofit. Persistent reverse flow indicates seat damage or debris lodged in disc. Typical service life 15-25 years with proper maintenance.
Major Components
• Disc Assembly: Cast iron or ductile iron disc with bronze or stainless steel hinge pin, sized 80% of pipe diameter. Disc weight and counterweight selection critical for proper closing speed - too fast causes water hammer, too slow allows excessive reverse flow.
• Body/Bonnet: AWWA C508 ductile iron construction with flanged or mechanical joint ends. Wall thickness varies by pressure class (150-350 psi). Interior epoxy lining standard, exterior polyurethane coating for buried service.
• Seat Ring: Bronze or stainless steel seating surface, either integral or replaceable design. Seat angle typically 45-60 degrees for optimal sealing. Replaceable seats preferred for 12-inch and larger valves due to maintenance accessibility.
• Hinge Mechanism: Bronze or stainless steel pivot assembly with renewable bushings. External hinge access preferred for maintenance. Some designs include adjustable stops to limit disc travel and reduce slamming forces.
Design Criteria
• Flow Velocity: 3-12 fps typical operating range; 2-3 fps minimum to ensure proper closure; 15 fps maximum to prevent water hammer and excessive headloss.
• Pressure Rating: 125-250 PSI working pressure for municipal distribution; 85-150 PSI for typical plant piping; consider surge pressures up to 2x static.
• Headloss: 0.5-3.0 feet at design flow rates; resilient-seated typically 40% lower headloss than metal-seated; factor into pump head calculations.
• Valve Size: 4"-48" diameter range for municipal applications; 6"-24" most common for treatment plants; 8"-36" typical for transmission mains.
• Closing Speed: 1-3 seconds typical for municipal applications; faster closing reduces backflow but increases water hammer risk; adjustable dashpots available 6" and larger.
• Leakage Rate: Class VI shutoff (bubble-tight) for resilient seats; metal seats allow 0.5% of Cv leakage per AWWA C508; consider application criticality.
• Installation Orientation: Horizontal preferred; vertical flow-up acceptable with spring assist; vertical flow-down requires external weight or spring.
• End Connections: Flanged per AWWA C115/ANSI B16.1 most common; mechanical joint for buried service; grooved coupling for plant piping flexibility.
Key Design Decisions
• What minimum flow velocity is required to keep the valve fully open? Velocities below 2-3 fps may cause disc flutter or incomplete opening, leading to premature wear and increased headloss. Need system flow curves and minimum operating scenarios. Consequence: Reduced valve life, efficiency losses, potential failure during low-flow conditions.
• Should you specify resilient or metal seats for your application? Resilient seats provide bubble-tight shutoff and lower headloss but limited to 180°F and certain chemicals. Metal seats handle higher temperatures/pressures but allow some leakage. Need fluid temperature, chemistry, and shutoff requirements. Consequence: Wrong choice leads to seal failure, excessive leakage, or temperature damage.
• Is external loading (spring/weight) required for reliable closure? Standard swing checks rely on reverse flow for closure. Applications with minimal backflow, vertical installation, or critical shutoff need spring assist or external weights. Analyze system hydraulics and consequence of backflow. Consequence: Valve may not close reliably, allowing significant reverse flow and potential equipment damage.
• What surge analysis is needed for valve sizing and selection? Swing check closure time affects water hammer magnitude. Fast-closing valves reduce backflow but increase surge pressures. Need transient analysis for systems over 10" diameter or high-velocity applications. Consequence: Undersized valve ratings lead to failure; oversized creates unnecessary cost and space requirements.
Specification Section
• Primary: 40 05 23 - Valves for Plumbing Piping
• Secondary: 33 11 00 - Water Utility Distribution Piping (for transmission applications)
• Municipal water/wastewater treatment applications typically fall under plumbing piping specifications, with utility distribution sections covering larger transmission valve installations.
Submittal + Construction Considerations
• Material/Equipment Verification: Verify body material (ductile iron vs cast iron) matches specifications; Confirm seat material compatibility with water chemistry; Check hinge pin material (stainless steel preferred)
• Installation Requirements: Minimum 5-10 pipe diameters upstream for proper flow profile; Horizontal installation typically required; Access space needed for maintenance/inspection
• Field Challenges: Weight considerations for larger sizes (12"+ valves require lifting equipment); Proper orientation critical - flow direction arrows must be verified
• Coordination Issues: Lead times typically 8-12 weeks for standard municipal sizes; Coordinate with bypass provisions during installation
Popular Manufacturers and Models
• American Flow Control (AFC) - Series 2500 resilient seated swing check, widely specified in municipal applications.
• Mueller Water Products - A-2361 swing check valve, standard in many utility specifications.
• Crispin Valves - Model 35 swing check, popular for smaller municipal systems.
• Kennedy Valve (McWane) - Series 700 swing check, common in Southeast US municipal projects.
• All maintain strong municipal market presence with local representation.
Alternative Equipment
• Tilting disc check valves offer lower head loss but higher cost (15-25% premium). Preferred for energy-critical applications.
• Ball check valves provide faster closure but limited to smaller sizes (<8").
• Dual-plate wafer checks cost 20-30% less but require full flange ratings.
• Silent check valves eliminate water hammer but cost 40-50% more - justified only where noise is critical concern.
• Swing checks remain most cost-effective for typical municipal applications 6"-24".
Real-World Tips
Manufacturer relationships matter - establish contacts with local reps for technical support and emergency replacements. Many utilities maintain agreements with 2-3 manufacturers for competitive pricing. Cost-saving opportunity: specify "or equal" rather than sole-source to leverage competition. Consider valve exercising programs - quarterly operation prevents seizure and extends service life. For critical applications, stock spare internal components (seats, hinge pins) rather than complete valve assemblies.
Connect with a Local Distributor
If you need help with sizing, system compatibility, maintenance planning, or sourcing, connect with your local manufacturer's representative. They can assist you in selecting the right equipment for your specific application and site conditions.
